What to review now
The short list of things that actually need a human look, newest first.
What to review now
Newest first. Everything is on main — GitHub renders the Markdown and shows CSVs
as sortable tables, so no local checkout or DataHub account is needed.
2026-08-30 — autonomous session + follow-ups
One diff with everything: https://github.com/datasets/datapressr/compare/7eca8eb…main
| Thing | Look at | Why it needs eyes |
|---|---|---|
| Project Drawdown dataset | folder · README · solutions.csv | Is the tidy shape right? Is the licensing call (facts → PDDL-1.0 + attribution) one you're comfortable with? |
| Portable skills | skills/ · skills/README.md | Do the six skills read consistently? Is the npx skills layout what you expected? |
| This site | site/ | Is the landing page's framing of the product right? |
Open questions parked for you
- Project Drawdown still needs relocating into the real
datasets/climate-and-environmentrepo before it goes live (it's staged insidedatapressrfor review). - Charting approach is undecided on purpose — it gets picked from the friction of writing the first data story (#9), not before.
Tracking
Active work is in GitHub issues so nothing gets lost:
#6 cloud execution ·
#7 this site ·
#8 wrangle co2-ppm ·
#9 first data story.
Short "what's actionable" view: datasets/NEXT.md.
